EVENTS
CONVENT HIGH SCHOOL
23/08/2021 CLASS-10 SESSION2021-22(SLOT-1)
SOCIAL SCIENCE(HISTORY)
Chapter-2
NATIONALISM IN INDIA
_______________________________________
Q.1. Explain:(a) Why is the growth of nationalism in the colonies linked to an anti-colonial movement ?
(b) How did the First World War help
in the growth of the National Movement in India?
Or
Explain any four facts to show how did
the First World War help in the growth of the National Movement in India.
(a) Why were Indians outraged by the
Rowlatt Act ?
(b) Why did Gandhiji decide to
withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement?
Ans.(a) The growth of Modern
nationalism in the colonies is linked to an anti-colonial movement due to the
factors as mentioned below :
People began discovering their unity
in the process of their struggle with colonialism. The sense of being oppressed
under colonialism provided a shared bond that tied many different groups
together.
As each class and group felt the
effects of colonialism differently, their experiences were varied and their
notions of freedom were not always the same, so the Congress under Mahatma
Gandhi tried to forge these groups together within one movement.
Thus, in spite of differences and
conflicts, different groups and communities came under the banner of Indian
National Congress and took part in various movements which were anti¬colonial
or against the British.
(b) The First World War helped in the
growth of the National Movement in India as it created a new economic and pitical
situation as mentioned below :
The defense expenditure had increased.
War loans were taken and more taxes
were imposed.
Custom duties were raised.
Income tax was introduced.
The rise in prices led to extreme
hardships for the people.
There was widespread discontentment in
the rural area due to forced recruitment of soldiers.
In 1918-19 and 1920-21 crops failed in
many parts of India resulting in acute shortages of food.
There was influenza epidemic too.
According to the Census of 1921, twelve to thirteen million people perished as
a result of famines and epidemics. People thought that their hardships and
suffering would come to an end after the war but that did not happen. So these
factors were responsible for the rise of nationalism in India.
(c) Indians were outraged by the
Rowlatt Act (1919) due to the following reasons :
They had hoped that after the war
their hardships would be over and the government would take steps to improve
their condition.
On the other hand, the government got
the Rowlatt Act passed in the Imperial Legislative Council against the united
opposition of the Indian members.
The Act gave the government enormous
powers to repress political activities. It allowed detention of political
prisoners without trial for two years.
These provisions meant the suspension
of two principles of justice – trial by jury and habeas corpus – the rights
safeguarding against illegal imprisonment.
The Rowlatt Act was considered as
Black Law and the Indians under the leadership of Gandhi decided to oppose it
by non-violent civil disobedience which would start with a hartal on 6 April.
(d) Gandhiji decided to withdraw the
Non-Cooperation Movement due to the reasons as mentioned below :
The movement was turning violent in
many places.
Gandhiji thought that Satyagrahis
needed to be properly trained before they would be ready for mass struggles.
This was in context of the incident in Chauri-Chaura, a village in Gorakhpur
district UP where twenty two policemen were brutally killed after they had
fired on a political procession.
There had been disturbances in Madras
and Calcutta also. The above factors made it clear that the country was not yet
ready of mass movement. So Gandhiji prevailed upon the Congress Working
Committee to call off the movement.
Q.2. What is meant by the idea of
Satyagraha?
Or
Explain the idea of Satyagraha
according to Gandhiji.
Ans.Satyagraha is pure soul-force.
Truth is the very substance of the
soul. That is why this force is called Satyagraha.
The soul is informed with knowledge.
It burns the flame of love.
Non-violence is the supreme dharma.
The idea of Satyagraha emphasised the
power of truth and the need to search for truth. It suggested that if the cause
was true, if the struggle was against injustice, then the physical force was
not necessary to fight the oppressor.
Without seeking vengeance or being
aggressive, a satyagrahi could win the battle through non-violence.
In Satyagraha, people including the
oppressors – had to be persuaded to see the truth, instead of being forced to
accept truth through the use of violence.
In this way by this struggle, truth
was bound to ultimately triumph. Mahatma Gandhi believed that this dharma of
non-violence would unite all Indians.
Q.3. Write a newspaper report on :
(a) The Jallianwala Bagh massacre
(b) The Simon Commission
Ans. (a) The Jallianwala Bagh
massacre: A public meeting was announced for the 13th April 1919, at
Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar to protest against the Rowlatt Act. The people were
allowed to assemble there. After they had gathered there in thousands, General
Dyer marched there with armoured cars and troops. Without giving any warning to
the people to disperse, he ordered firing on the unarmed, and peaceful people.
The casualties among the Indians were very heavy. Dyer’s purpose in doing so
was to ‘produce a moral effect’, to create in the minds of Satyagrahis, a
feeling of terror and awe. This massacre of innocent people in thousands
converted Mahatma Gandhi into a non-cooperator.
(b) (i) The Indian members of the
Central Legislative Assembly exposed the drawbacks in the Government of India
Act of 1919 A.D. As a result of it, the Simon Commission was appointed in 1927
A.D. to suggest any further constitutional reforms. This commission consisted
of seven members and its Chairman was Sir John Simon.
(ii) Why was it boycotted by the
Indians?
But Indians boycotted the Simon
Commission because there was no Indian member in this commission. The terms of
the commission’s appointment did not give any indication of ‘Swaraj’, while the
demand of the Indians was only ‘Swaraj’. Therefore, the Indian National
Congress, the Muslim League, and other parties decided to oppose the Simon
Commission.
(iii) Methods: Indian people organised
hartals all over the country. They also held a black flag demonstration with
the slogan, “Simon go back”, when the Commission reached Bombay (Mumbai). Such
demonstrations were held everywhere it went.
Q.4. List all the different social
groups which joined the Non-Cooperation Movement of 1921. Choose any three, and
write about their hopes and struggles to show why they joined the movement.
Ans. Social Groups who took part in
the NonCooperation Movement. In the Non- Cooperation Movement (1920-1922), the
following social groups took part.
(I) Middle-class people in the towns.
The movement in the cities: The
Movement started with middle-class participation in the cities. Thousands of
students left government-controlled schools and colleges, headmasters and
teachers resigned, and lawyers gave up their legal practices.
Boycott of council elections: The
Council elections were boycotted in most provinces except Madras (Chennai),
where the Justice Party, the party of the nonBrahmans, felt that entering the
council was one way of gaining some power, something that usually only Brahmans
had an access to.
Swadeshi: The Non-Cooperation Movement
had a great impact on the Indian textile industry. Swadeshi goods, especially
cloth got a great impetus. Foreign goods were boycotted, liquor shops picketed,
and foreign cloth burnt in huge bonfires.
Impact on industry: In many places,
merchants and traders refused to trade in foreign goods or finance foreign
trade. Due to this, the demand for Indian textile mills and handlooms went up.
The increase in demand provided a big relief to the vanishing textile industry
of India.
Movement in the countryside: Though
people in the countryside interpreted the idea of ‘Swaraj’ in their own way but
they participated in the movement on large scale. In Awadh, peasants launched
the movement against the talukdars and landlords. Whereas the plantation
workers launched the movement against the tea estate owners.
(II) Peasants in rural areas.
(i) Participants: In the countryside,
the movement was led by the peasants, tribals and the local leaders. For
example, in Awadh, it was Baba Ramchandra sanyasi, who had earlier been to Fiji
as an indentured labourer.
(ii)
Why rural people participated?
The movement here was not against the
Britishers but against talukdars and landlords. The problems of the rural
people were different from those of the urban people:
The talukdars and landlords were
demanding very high rents and a variety of other taxes.
Peasants had to do begarand work at
the landlord’s farms without any payment.
The peasants had no security of
tenure. They were regularly evicted so that they could acquire no security of
tenure.
As the problems of the people were
different, their demands were also different. The peasant
movement demanded:
Reduction of revenue
Abolition of begar
Redistribution of land
Social boycott of oppressive
landlords.
(iii) Ways of protests: The Movement
in the countryside had a different angle. In many places, Nai-dhobi bandhs were
organised by the Panchayats to deprive the landlords of the services of
barbers, cobblers, washermen, etc. Even national leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru
went to villages in Awadh to know the grievances of the people. By October, the
Awadh Kissan Sabhas was set up headed by Jawaharlal Nehru, Baba Ramchandra, and
a few others. When the movement spread in 1921, the houses of talukdars and
merchants were attacked. The movement turned violent which was not liked by
some of the Congress leaders.
(III) Tribal people.
Most of the tribal people were
dependent on forests for their livelihood but under the new Forest Policy, the
government had put several restrictions on the people :
Closing large forest area for the
tribal people.
Forcing the local people to contribute
begar.
Preventing people from entering the
forests to graze their cattle, or to collect fuelwood and fruits.
All these steps enraged the hill
people. Not only were their livelihoods affected, but they felt that their
traditional rights were also being denied. So the people revolted.
(IV)
Plantation workers.
(i) For plantation workers in Assam,
freedom meant the right to move freely in and out of the confined space in
which they were enclosed, and it meant retaining a link with the village from
which they had come.
The government had passed the Inland
Emigration Act of 1859 under which plantation workers were not permitted to
leave the tea estates without permission, and in fact, they were rarely given
such permission.
When the plantation workers heard of
the Non-Cooperation Movement, thousands of them defied the authorities, left
the plantations and headed towards their homes.
The plantation workers believed that
the Gandhi Raj was coming, and everyone would be given land in their own villages.
Formulae Handbook for Class 10 Maths
and Science
Q.5. Discuss the Salt March to make
clear why it was an effective symbol of resistance against colonialism.
Ans. The Salt March was an effective
symbol of resistance against colonialism because-
It was the first time that Indian
leaders decided to violate law. People were now asked not only to refuse
cooperation with the British, but also to break colonial laws.
Thousands of Indians in different
parts of the country broke the salt law, manufactured salt and demonstrated in
front of the government salt factories.
As the movement spread, foreign cloth
was boycotted and liquor shops were picketed. Peasants refused to pay revenue
and ‘chaukidari taxes’, village officials resigned, and in many places forest
people violated forest laws – going into Reserved Forests to collect wood and
graze cattle.
Worried by the development, the
colonial government began arresting the Congress leaders, one by one. This led
to violent clashes in many places. Angry crowd demonstrated in the streets,
facing armoured cars and police firing. Many were killed.
When Mahatma Gandhi himself was
arrested, industrial workers in Sholapur attacked police posts, municipal
buildings, law courts and railway stations – all structures that symbolised the
British rule.
The outcome of the movement was the
Gandhi-Irwin Pact which was signed by Gandhiji with Irwin on 5th March, 1931.
By this Gandhi-Irwin Pact, Gandhiji consented to participate in a Round Table
Conference in London and the government agreed to release the political
prisoners.
Q.6. Imagine you are a woman
participating in the Civil Disobedience Movement. Explain what the experience
meant to your life.
Or
‘Women played a very important role in
the Civil Disobedience Movement.’ Explain.
Ans.Women participated in large
numbers in the Civil Disobedience Movement.
During the movement, thousands of
women came out of their homes to listen to Gandhiji.
They participated in protest marches,
manufactured salt, and picked foreign cloth and liquor shops.
Many were put to jail by the police.
Moved by Gandhiji’s call, they began
to see service to the nation as a sacred duty of women.
Q.7. Why did the political leaders differ sharply over the question of separate
electorates ?[CBSE2015]
Ans. By the system of separate
electorates, we mean such a system when people of one religion only vote for a
candidate of their own religion. Using such a system, was a mischief of the
British Government who wanted to divide the people to weaken the national
movement. By doing so, the British wanted to prolong their stay in India.
The different political leaders differed over the question of separate electorates because of the following reasons :
(1) The Congress leaders opposed the
policy of the British Government in instigating different peoples in demanding
separate electorate. They knew well that it was all the mischief of the British
Government who encouraged different people to ask for separate electorates
because such a policy would weaken the national movement, and prolong
Britishers stay in India. The Congress leaders were one and all in favour of
joint electorates.
(2) The Muslim leaders, like Muhammed
Iqbal and Mr Jinnah asked for separate electorates to safeguard the political
interests of the Muslims. In their opinion, the majority of the people were
Hindus, and so in case of joint electorates, the Muslims would have little
chance of winning the seats. As such, they would always be at the mercy of the
Hindus.
(3) The leaders of the Depressed
Classes, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, also asked for separate electorates because in the
joint electorates, he feared the dominance of the upper electorates or the
upper caste Hindus in the elections. By the Poona Pact he, however, agreed to
have joint electorates with the Hindus, provided the seats for the Depressed
Classes were fixed or reserved in the Provincial and Central Legislative
Councils.
Outcome: Lord Irwin announced in
October 1929, a vague, offer of ‘dominion status’ for India.
